This content has been translated from the original text.
With the development of artificial intelligence technologies, the legal limits on the generation and use of the human voice are becoming increasingly uncertain. The processing of a person’s voice by means of artificial intelligence and its use in new content gives rise to significant legal debates in terms of personality rights, the protection of personal data and commercial use. In view of the absence of a clear regulation specific to this area in Turkish law, this study addresses how the existing legal rules can be applied to voice generation by artificial intelligence and the scope of the legal protection of an individual’s voice.
Artificial intelligence technologies have in recent years entered almost every area of life; systems that can write text, generate images and even sing have become ordinary tools of daily life. This technological transformation, particularly in the field of music, with the human voice being processed by artificial intelligence and new content being produced, has taken on a dimension that attracts public attention and brings with it legal debates to the same extent.
Today, it is technically possible to produce new audio content on the basis of a person’s voice samples without that person’s knowledge and consent. However, this possibility creates an area of significant legal uncertainty. This is because there is no clear and specific regulation in Turkish law as to the legal nature of such uses, which rights they may infringe and which legal remedies may be pursued against such infringements.
Legal Nature of Voice Generation by Artificial Intelligence
Voice generation by artificial intelligence takes place, in most cases, through the analysis of voice samples of a person that have previously been recorded and the creation of voices of a similar nature on the basis of that analysis. The fact that the resulting voice has not actually been spoken by the person concerned does not mean that legal liability disappears.
The copyright system in Turkish law essentially aims to protect works that arise from the creative activity of the human mind. For this reason, it is generally not considered possible for content created by artificial intelligence in a fully autonomous manner to benefit from copyright protection in the classical sense. However, this does not mean that voices generated by artificial intelligence are completely free in legal terms. The voice may also be the subject of different areas of protection that lie outside copyright law.
Protection of the Voice in the Context of Personality Rights
In Turkish law, personality rights have a broad area of protection covering an individual’s material and moral existence. A person’s voice, like his or her name and appearance, is one of the fundamental elements that distinguish that person from others, and in this respect it is regarded as a natural part of the personality right. The use of a voice without the consent of the person concerned means that third parties dispose over the individual’s identity, and this constitutes an unlawful interference.
Where voices generated by artificial intelligence are made available to the public without the knowledge and approval of the person concerned, consequences may arise such as the individual being represented against his or her will, words he or she did not say being attributed to him or her, or his or her professional and social reputation being damaged. For this reason, such uses made through the voice are regarded as an attack on personality rights.
Commercial Use and Legal Balance
It is also seen that voices generated by artificial intelligence are increasingly used for commercial purposes. Income being earned from content shared on digital platforms and these voices being featured in advertising and promotional activities are among the factors that make the legal assessment even more serious. Obtaining economic benefit on the basis of another person’s voice creates an advantage that is incompatible with the rule of good faith adopted by the legal order.
At this point the matter ceases to be merely an individual rights violation; it also becomes conduct that affects market order and the principle of fair competition. Deriving benefit from a person’s distinctive vocal characteristics or renown is capable of impairing the economic and professional balance that must be protected in law.
Assessment from the Perspective of the Protection of Personal Data
In most cases, the voice is information that allows a direct link to be made to a person. For this reason, the collection and processing of voice recordings and their use in artificial intelligence systems must also be assessed within the scope of the principles on the protection of personal data. The purposes for which voice data is used, how long it is stored and with whom it is shared are important in determining legal liability.
The processing of voice data in this manner without consent constitutes an interference with the individual’s private sphere and is incompatible with the fundamental principles on the protection of personal data. In this respect, voice generation by artificial intelligence presents itself as a legal problem that must be assessed not only on the basis of the resulting content but by taking into account the entire data-processing process leading up to the production of that content.
Conclusion and Assessment
Although voice generation by artificial intelligence strains the limits of existing legal concepts, it cannot be said to fall entirely outside legal protection. The absence of a specific regulation on this subject in Turkish law does not prevent the application of the existing general provisions; on the contrary, it allows an effective legal assessment to be made on the basis of fundamental principles such as personality rights, the rule of good faith and the protection of personal data.
Considering the speed of technological developments, it is clear that these new problem areas arising from artificial intelligence will take clearer shape in the coming period through both legislation and judicial decisions. In this process, it should not be forgotten that the fundamental aim of the law is not to restrict technology but to create a balanced framework that will protect the individual’s dignity, identity and will.
